L'amour: The Second Hand Emotion

One of the most obscurely used terms for a certain emotion is love.This post is dealing with the special sect of love. The romantic Love. The movie screen, grand and cliched love.  Back in the 90s, most of the movies, in Bollywood, had a central theme of love. The story of the movie was essentially bound around this very emotion. As the trend changed the central theme of movies varied as well. Frankly, that really baffled me as a child because all I had known about movies in India, during my few years on earth, was it had to have a love story. Lacking that would feel like something was missing. #HopelessRomantic from the start.

The basic theme of love as the center of a story is somehow a product of Shakespeare's work and popularity. His play the Romeo and Juliet is the epitome of the given standard of romantic love. There were, of course, many older texts based on love, but none were so swelled with the passion of Love. Romeo and Juliet placed romantic love on a pedestal of emotions.
The inception of the idea of love, as such, with a goal of "lived happily ever after" became a part of our society. Marriages were slowly replaced, from the classic economic and social tool to a fulfillment of one's emotional need of a perfectly suitable partner. Love was no longer a reasonable 'dealing' with families involved. Love broke free from the clutches of idealistic orders to a rebellion of following one's heart.

It was the brilliance of Shakespeare to identify the emotional, psychological and social state of people of that time and bringing it all together in a dynamic manner. During the time of Shakespear people were being diagnosed with the psychological sicknesses. He took that tragedy of the human condition and made something quite profound. Something that is an exhibition of his excel in human behavior.
The behavior of a person towards love is innate. However, the culture of the expression of that love has environmental influences. Shakespear made love, The love as we know it nowadays. The emotion we see expressed so passionately shown in movies and books. What was express the contemporary romantic love is what we learn from the society and culture around us. In a way, the means of expression is handed over to us. It is a second-hand emotion. The feeling is intrinsic, but its execution is culture driven.

Here is an idea that I would like to propose, In a way, this romantic love diminished the idea of 'self'. It occurred to me that my regular catching up with my friends often involved questions on my well being followed by inquiries about my relationship status. These casual queries are pretty common for singles. / Cut to: A soft  nudge on the elbow in a wedding with a whisper "You Are Next!"/ Ugh! Spare me the cringe.
It has become a task, a goal to achieve as basic as graduating high school. It also took away the individualistic identity of a human. People start looking for "soulmates" in order to "complete" themselves. As if something vital for their existence is missing. We already are complete and fully functional beings. Romanticism hijacked love and made it a project. Love is no longer just a feeling like other feelings it is a glorified goal.
Our evolutionary and unconscious goal, as a species, is to carry on the life. Regardless of the romanticization that would have gone on. This idea of romantic love addresses our core question of being. Why are we here? The idea of romantic love also helps us cope with it. We justify it, when we are in love, as the prime source of satisfaction and meaning of life. Our existential crisis of the meaning of life is assuaged by it. This belief gives a grand start to a relationship.  

On the contrary, to make a relationship survive one has to put this idea of love in the backseat. Both parties need to work on the relationship constantly to make it work. It often happens that one person becomes the 'taker' and other becomes the 'giver'. Eventually, such dynamics collapse and the relationship falls apart. For love to last and be truly fulfilling it has to be balanced throughout the duration of its course.
We often hear that the essence of love is trust and compromise. Nothing is idealistic, both people in one way or other need to be compliant to make the ends meet. The trust in not only that your partner will not turn into a jerk and cheat on you. The trust that when you put altruistic efforts into the relationship they will make sure you don't lose yourself in those attempts. They will make sure that it is fair to you. With that thought, I will end the blog with a quote from a book I recently read.
"Against all the evidence of his senses, 
a man who is in love declares that 'I' and 'you' are one, 
and is prepared to behave as if it were a fact.” 

~Sigmund Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents

What Is your opinion on love? Let me know in comment section below.
Find me on the following: Social Media

    Comments

    Love is the driving force for good in life. What is the opposite of love? Hate. I know which one is best!

    Absolutely Amazing Alliteration
    I think love is beautiful, but there are many many people out there who do not understand it. Love can be very hard at times, but it is very much worth the effort.
    Tasha
    Tasha's Thinkings - Shapeshifters and Werewolves
    Sayanti Deb said…
    It's true that we often hear that the essence of love is trust and compromise. But, I don't think the compromise has any relation with love. Real life never needs compromise, tin flows like a river. I'd like to substitute the word " compromise" with "acceptance". this suits better with love. What do you think, Karnika?

    -Sayanti and here is my LINK
    I tend to think more about the love of God/Jesus than the love of one particular person. As in I should love all, avoid judgment as much as possible, be kind to all I meet, etc… I'm kind of opposed to the idea that there is one perfect person for everyone. (Why then do some people remarry after their former spouse dies and find just as much love in that relationship?) I've also found, for me at least, it's best to marry someone you already get along with as a friend first and foremost and worry less about attraction because I think you can choose to be attracted. I guess I'm just not a willing believer or follower in the traditional ideas about love and marriage. I think everyone has to make up their mind and do what is right for themselves first and foremost with regards to love rather than relying on Shakespear or tv/movies to decide it for them.

    With Love,
    Mandy
    Karnika Kapoor said…
    Thanks! everyone for your awesome comments and reviews. So glad to see you all stop by.

    @ Duncan D. Horne, Indeed. :)

    @ Natasha Duncan-Drake, So true! Sadly so many don't understand it... Yet if one finds the right person all the efforts are worth it. :)

    @ Sayanti Deb, You are amongst a few lucky ones I would say. I am glad you think this way. Your point is valid, Yet, for some of us the next step to acceptance a requirement for a compromise ... for the benefit of the relationship. Nevertheless, in the end, it is worth it. :)

    @ Mandy, I totally am with you on that. There is no perfect person one has to put in efforts to make it work. Marrying someone you get along with is a win-win. And in the end, it is a personal choice really. :)

    Geraint Isitt said…
    I think there are varying degrees of love, but each one requires trust and acceptance of variousness levels. I love my family, but that love would be different to the love I have for my wife (hypothetical). The base foundations are the same, but they are different beings altogether. And yes, a firm friendship that develops into something deeper is always a great recipe.
    Ronnie said…
    Nice post! Some good contrasts, convincing! quite a thought provoking post.
    Freud was pretty eloquent here, right?
    H&k

    Popular posts from this blog

    Quaint Quantum Phenomena

    Weirdness of The Colour Spectrum

    Alexandria: The Muser's Hub